1.
Reviewer’s Name:
2.
URL of Web Site Reviewed:
3.
Type of Web Site Evaluated:
4.
For what grade level is this site intended?
5.
Is it designed for special student populations? If so, please
indicate which groups are targeted:
What are the best features of the site? What can students do at this
site?
Evaluate the site using the rubric below. Enter the points for each
element in the box on the right.
Element
|
Needs Improvement |
Shows Promise |
Strength Area |
Points |
Curriculum
S
See the Utah Core
Curriculum Standards
http://www.usoe.k12.ut.us/curr/1testa.htm
|
The site is unrelated to what students typically study.
(0 points) |
This site is somewhat related to what students
might study in a core subject or elective course.
(3 points) |
This site is clearly related to what students
might study in a core subject or an elective course and can be used to
support, enrich, or extend student learning .
(6 points) |
|
Standards
See the Utah
Core Curriculum Standards
http://www.usoe.k12.ut.us/curr/1testa.htm |
Goals and objectives are not clear and/or there
is no reference to standards.
(0 points) |
There is some mention on the site, in the
Teacher's Guide section, or elsewhere, of goals, objectives, and their
relation to standards.
(3 points) |
Goals and objectives are clearly stated and are
matched to standards.
(6 points) |
|
Authority
S
|
You can not figure out who authored the content
or whether the author is a reliable expert.
(0 points) |
The author or producer of the site is identified,
but there is no background information available.
(2 points) |
The creator of the site and her/his credentials
are noted
(4 points) |
|
Element
|
Needs Improvement |
Shows Promise |
Strength Area |
Points |
Activity Helpers
|
The site does NOT contain suggestions for how
students can conduct investigations, create presentations, or complete
projects.
(0 points) |
The site contains suggestions for how students
can conduct investigations, create presentations, or complete
projects.
(2 points) |
The site includes graphic organizers, templates
or forms to help with student work.
(4 points) |
|
Teachers' Aids
|
The site contains no resources to assist
teachers.
(0 points) |
The site contains a few lesson plans and
suggestions to assist teachers.
(2 points) |
The site contains detailed lesson plans,
suggestions for how to manage activities in different settings,
strategies for supporting special needs students, and activity
extensions.
(4 points) |
|
Grade Level
|
No grade level is specified on the site, OR the specified grade level
is too broad to be meaningful. (0 points)
|
Material or activities are NOT well-matched to
its target audience. The reading level is too high or too low, or the
activities are either too complex or too simple.
(2 points) |
Material and activities on the site are
well-matched to the target audience.
(4 points) |
|
Answer for RESOURCE or SUPPLEMENTAL sites
only |
|
Element |
Needs Improvement |
Shows Promise |
Strength Area |
Points |
Quality of Content
S
|
The information on this site is shallow,
out-of-date, or just the same as what can usually be found in a text
book or in the school library.
(0 points) |
The information on this site is more extensive or
more current than what is likely to be found at school.
(3 points) |
The information is timely, extensive, and
dynamic. The use of animation, sound, graphics, or other enhancements
makes it easier to understand and/or enjoy the material.
(6 points) |
|
Answer for PROJECT sites only |
|
Quality of Information
See Principles of Engaged Learning
http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/content/cntareas/math/ma2lindi.htm
|
This site uses no or few principles of engaged
learning
(0 points) |
This site uses some principles of engaged
learning (3 points) |
This site uses several principles of engaged
learning
(6 points) |
|
Interactivity
|
Can't email anyone or leave a message on a
bulletin board or contribute your ideas anywhere on the site!
(0 points) |
Can contact someone on this site, but messages
aren't monitored for appropriateness
(3 points) |
Messages may be sent to experts, author, and
others and messages are monitored. (6 points). |
|
Element |
Needs Improvement |
Shows Promise |
Strength Area |
Points |
Publishing
|
Even though the site is intended to help students
with a school project, there's neither a place where students can
share their work nor suggestions for how to share student work
locally.
(0 points) |
The site contains suggestions for ways students
can share their work online or with their local community.
(3 points) |
The site includes an area where students can
share their work online and includes instructions for contributing
student work.
(6 points) |
|
Answer for ALL sites |
|
Connections
S
|
This site dead-ends. There aren't any links to
other online resources.
(0 points) |
The site contains links to other resources, but
they are not described.
(1 point)
|
This site links out to other well-described
resources on the same topic.
(2 points) |
|
Design
S
|
This site just isn't put together well! The
colors are distracting, the words are hard to read. The layout makes
it hard to use the site.
(0 points) |
The site is well designed and generally
appealing.
(1 point) |
The site is visually appealing and uses colors
and graphics to enhance the impact of the information.
(2 points) |
|
Navigation
S
|
Getting around is confusing. It's easy to feel
lost.
(0 points) |
You can navigate the site, but sometimes it is
difficult to get to the section you want. (1 point). |
Navigation is easy due to the use of navigation
tools, e.g., pull-down menus, an index, a site map (2 points) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Element |
Needs Improvement |
Shows Promise |
Strength Area |
Points |
Technical features
S
|
Web technology is NOT used effectively. High-tech
features on the site distract from the site's purpose, or make it slow
or likely to crash.
(0 points) |
Web technology is generally used effectively.
However, if the site features "new" tech goodies, like shockwave,
sound, java and animation, they seem to be unrelated to the
instructional purpose.
(1 point) |
Web technology is used effectively. If the site
features "new" tech goodies, like shockwave, sound, java and
animation, they are used to make the information more clear.
(2 points) |
|
Tone
S
|
There is evidence of disrepect or hate toward a
person or a group.
(0 points) |
There is evidence of bias or unexplained
negativity on the site.
(1 point) |
Neutral or positive attitudes predominate. Any
bias is mitigated by background information on the author’s
perspective or other information.
(2 points) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|